Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

University Patents, Inc. v. Kligman

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 7, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-3525, 90-0422PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WALDMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania and University Patents, Inc., commenced this action to recover royalties allegedly owed to them by defendant Dr. Albert Kligman for his development and licensing of a medication for photoaged (sun-damaged) skin.

Presently before the court is plaintiff University’s motion to disqualify the lawyer representing defendants Johnson & Johnson and Kligman based on certain ex 'parte contacts between that lawyer and various present and former employees of the University of Pennsylvania. Plaintiff also seeks to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. W. T. Grant Company v. Mark S. Haines, and John A. ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  3. United States v. Eid Hammad, A/K/A Eddie Hammad, and Taiseer HammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. Amarin Plastics, Inc. v. Maryland Cup Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
  5. Chancellor v. Boeing Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Curley v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  2. Hanntz v. Shiley, Inc. a Div. of Pfizer, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
  3. Camden v. State of MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1996
  4. Miano v. AC & R Advertising, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  5. McCallum v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1993

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API