Legal Opinion

Abelseth v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1933No. Docket No. 8441PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiffs, husband and wife, commenced this action to recover damages alleged to have been incurred from injuries sustained by Mrs. Abelseth when she was hit about 2:15 P. M., July 29, 1929, by one of the defendants’ street-cars. The accident happened on Market Street east of Eighth. Street. Near the place of the collision there is a pedestrian. lane crossing Market Street. Mrs. Abelseth had been in the Crystal Palace Market and came out with a package in her hand and was in the act of crossing from the south .side of Market to the north side. It was the contention of the plaintiffs that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bailey v. Market Street Cable Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Spiegelman v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hildebrand v. Los Angeles Junction Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Barnett. v. GarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Hellman v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. O'Connor v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Dark v. Prudential Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API