Legal Opinion
Hellman v. Bradley
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 9, 1936No. Civ. 9855PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment after verdict of the superior court in an action for wrongful death.
Plaintiffs sue as the surviving wife and son of decedent Heilman, who met his death while driving an automobile which came into collision with a light delivery truck owned by defendants Bradley and driven by their employee Hos- kins. Vermont Avenue is 13Ó feet wide, divided into two lanes, one for southbound and one for northbound traffic, which are separated by a right of way carrying double tracks of the Pacific Electric Railway. North of One Hundred and Twentieth Street the lanes…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Seller v. Market-Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Francesconi v. BelluominiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Pire v. Gladding McBean & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Argo v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Gulley v. WarrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.