State v. Nortin
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBband, J.
¥e will first consider whether there was substantial evidence to support the verdict. The court fully instructed the jury on the law of murder in the first degree, murder in the second degree, and voluntary and involuntary manslaughter. The jury found the defendant “guilty of manslaughter” without specifying whether voluntary or involuntary. This general form of verdict was proper if supported by evidence of either voluntary or involuntary manslaughter. State v. Setsor, 61 Or. 90, 119 P. 346.
The statute provides:
“In all cases, the defendant may be found guilty of any crime, the commission of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- The Charles MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Strickland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- State v. FarnamOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- State v. BartmessOregon Supreme Court · 1898
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. ZobelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. TornquistSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Wulff v. Sprouse-Reitz Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. WilsonOregon Supreme Court · 1948
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.