Legal Opinion

Scandrett v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

Appellants contend that the accident causing the injuries resulting in the death of Cole did not arise out of his employment. Sec. 102.03, Stats., specifies the conditions of liability as follows :

“(1) Liability under this chapter shall exist against an employer only where the following conditions concur:
“(a) Where the employee sustains an injury.
“(b) Where, at the time of the injury, both the employer and employee are subject to the provisions of this chapter.
“(c) Where, at the time of the injury, the employee is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. Every…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schroeder & Daly Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Lewis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Tiffany v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Newman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hipke v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Eckhardt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Van Pool v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Green Bay Warehouse Operators, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API