Legal Opinion
Kirsebom v. Connelly
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 16, 1992No. C6-91-2346PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge *
Ronald Kirsebom was injured after his motorcycle collided with the automobile of Daniel Connelly. Kirsebom sued Connelly for negligence.
At trial the jury found that neither party was negligent. The trial court then denied Kirsebom’s motion for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV).
On appeal Kirsebom argues that the court erred in denying the post-trial motions because, at trial evidence that Connelly had driven under the influence of alcohol created a prima facie case of negligence, which Connelly failed to rebut. Kirsebom claims that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Becker v. Alloy Hardfacing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Lindstrom v. Yellow Taxi Company of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tollefson v. EhlersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Christensen v. Milbank Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- M.L. v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Silicone Implant Insurance Coverage LitigationCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.