Legal Opinion

Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzimons

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1977No. 47259PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the Hennepin County District Court denying plaintiff’s alternative motion for amended and supplemental findings of fact, conclusions of law and order for judgment, or a new trial. Plaintiff sought recovery on a guaranty contract signed by defendant. The trial court sitting without a jury held that defendant was not liable on the contract because plaintiff failed to prove the primary obligation on which the guaranty depended. We reverse.

The trial evidence consisted of the testimony of one witness, David M. Gilman, plaintiff’s executive vice president, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Orvis v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. In Re Trust Known as Great Northern Iron Ore PropertiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  4. Anderson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Bass v. RingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Snyder Electric Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Anda Construction Co. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n, DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Kirsebom v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Berry v. GoetzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API