Legal Opinion

Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 3, 1974No. 43980PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacLaughlin, Justice.

After a jury verdict for defendant, plaintiff appeals from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment n.o.v. or a new trial. We affirm.

In the early morning hours on September 26, 1969, a 1969 Chevrolet automobile driven by plaintiff, George Poppenhagen, collided with a crawler tractor 1 belonging to defendant, Sornsin Construction Company, at a highway construction site on Pen nington County Road No. 17 approximately 1 mile south of Thief River Falls, Minnesota. Defendant, as part of a contract with the city of Thief River Falls, had agreed to lay water and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foster v. Herbison Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Kellett v. WasnieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Dornack v. Barton Construction CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  5. Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. LafortuneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Barr/Nelson, Inc. v. Tonto's, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Becker v. Mayo FoundationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  5. Application of SaxtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API