Scher v. Burke
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKruger, J.
*139 In Gion v. City of Santa Cruz (1970) 2 Cal.3d 29 , 84 Cal.Rptr. 162 , 465 P.2d 50 , this court held that private owners of certain coastal property who allowed the public to use the property for recreational purposes over a period of years thereby impliedly dedicated property rights to the public. In response to that decision, the Legislature enacted Civil Code section 1009, which limits the circumstances in which courts may find implied dedication of private coastal property. (Civ. Code, § 1009 (section 1009 ); see id. , subds. (e)-(g).) The statute further provides that "no use" of private…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- People v. GentileCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Gutierrez v. Carmax Auto Superstores Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2021
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.