Legal Opinion
Smith v. LoanMe, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 1, 2021No. S260391PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA JEREMIAH SMITH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. LOANME, INC., Defendant and Respondent. S260391 Fourth Appellate District, Division Two E069752 Riverside County Superior Court RIC1612501 April 1, 2021 Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye authored the opinion of the Court, in which Justices Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins concurred. SMITH v. LOANME, INC. S260391 Opinion of the Court by Cantil-Sakauye, C. J. Under Penal Code section 632.7, subdivision (a) (hereinafter section 632.7(a)),1 it is a crime when a person “without the consent of all parties to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Goodman v. LozanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Berroteran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- Brinkley v. Monterey Financial Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Cahill Construction Co., Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
- Cal. Water Curtailment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Cal. Water Curtailment CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.