Sterling v. Scott
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
Before JOLLY, DUHÉ and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:
In our earlier consideration of this death penalty habeas case, the petitioner sought a CPC and an order holding his unexhausted federal habeas petition in abeyance so that he could use federally appointed and paid counsel to exhaust his state posteonviction claims. We denied a CPC because he failed to exhaust his posteonviction claims, and we held that the petitioner had no statutory right to federally funded counsel to exhaust state remedies in state court. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McFarland v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Hallmark v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Campos v. JohnsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1997
- Tucker v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Death Row Prisoners of Pennsylvania v. RidgeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.