Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 13, 2005No. CR 00-1210PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

On May 20, 2005, the Federal Public Defender (FPD) filed a motion to recall the mandate in the case of Darrell Wayne Hill. This court denied the motion. See Hill v. State, 362 Ark. 659, 210 S.W.3d 123 (2005) (per curiam). In the Hill per curiam opinion, we raised the question of “by what authority the Federal Public Defender [was] representing defendants in capital cases in state court.” Id. We listed four cases where this had happened: Engram v. State, CR99-928; Hill v. State, CR00-1210; Nance v. State, CR99-365; and Newman v. State, CR03-1257. All four cases…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Michael LindseyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Echols v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  3. Robbins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Sterling v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Collins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Coulter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Coulter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Lee v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API