Legal Opinion

Murray v. Giarratano

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 23, 1989No. 88-411PublishedCited by 525 opinions

1Judgment of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist

Virginia death row inmates brought a civil rights suit against various officials of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The prisoners claimed, based on several theories, that the Constitution required that they be provided with counsel at the Commonwealth’s expense for the purpose of pursuing collateral proceedings related to their convictions and sentences. The courts below ruled that appointment of counsel upon request was necessary for the prisoners to enjoy their *4constitutional right to access .to the courts in pursuit of state habeas corpus relief. We think this holding is inconsistent with…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by525 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  3. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Pruitt v. MoteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  5. Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

520 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API