Legal Opinion

Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Palmer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 23, 1895No. 1,402PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom Porter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

The appellee recovered damages from appellant for burning up his land. Three paragraphs of complaint were each tested by demurrer. The overruling of this demurrer is one of the errors assigned. It is not denied that railroad companies are liable to respond in damages when they set fire to dry grass and other combustibles which they negligently suffer to accumulate upon their right-of-way, and without fault of the landowner, negligently permit to escape to his land, and burn up his land or destroy his other property (Lake Erie, etc., R. R. Co. v. Clark, 7 Ind. App. 155); but it is essential to…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NitscheIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Smith v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. IddingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Wabash Railroad v. LintonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GillenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. CountrymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Casto v. EigemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API