Legal Opinion
Smith v. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided June 19, 1890No. 14,347PublishedCited by 18 opinions
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, C. J.
The appellant commenced this action fey filing the following complaint, omitting the caption :
“ The plaintiff complains of the defendant and says that at the time of the grievances hereinafter set out, the defendant was a corporation, owning and operating a line of steam railroad from Yew Albany, Indiana, to Mt. Vernon, Illinois, and as such was a common carrier of freight and passengers; that on the 8th day of May, 1887, the plaintiff, not being in the employment or service of the defendant, was, by the invitation and permission of the conductor of such train, riding upon a certain freight…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Craker v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Eaton v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. McKeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1878
- Morris v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Jennifer Cox v. Evansville Police Department and The City of Evansville Babi Beyer v. The City of Fort WayneIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- Dougherty ex rel. Dougherty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. CooperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. PotterOhio Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.