Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Countryman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1896No. 1,913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

Appellee, as assignee of one Hart, sued appellant to recover for damages to real estate and personal property caused by fire, set out on its right of way and permitted to escape to said land by its negligence on a certain day. The motion to make the complaint more specific by averring what engine started the fire was properly overruled, especially in view of the averment of the pleader that he could not so do. Ohio, etc., R. W. Co. v. Trapp, 4 Ind. App. 69.

In order to present' any question upon the overruling of a motion to make more specific, it must be brought into the record by bill of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. BushIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. SwinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburg Railroad v. WolcottIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Patterson v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BrownIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. HobbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Brown v. LangnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API