Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Hixon

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8845PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C. C.

— Sparks from the appellant’s engines set. fire to some dried grass, weeds and rubbish, on the appellant’s *112land, appropriated for a right of way, and from said grass, •etc., the fire reached the appellee’s land adjoining said right •of way, and there burned up and destroyed the growing grass .and some stacks of hay and straw.

This suit was brought to recover damages for said burning.

The complaint was in two paragraphs. Demurrer to both ■paragraphs for want of facts sufficient, etc., were overruled. The appellant answered in three paragraphs. To the second of these paragraphs of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Jeffersonville Railroad v. Hendricks' AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Higgins v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  4. Ætna Insurance v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis R. R. v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad v. OstranderIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. NitscheIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Mathews v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API