Legal Opinion

Casto v. Eigeman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1904No. 20,323PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Dubois Circuit Court; E. A. Ely, Judge, Action by Jabez O. Casto against John G-. Eigeman. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

The appellant sued the appellee for damages on account of the breach of a contract in writing for the sale and conveyance of real estate. The cause was tried by a jury, and before the introduction of the evidence was finished, upon proof by the appellee of very gross misconduct of the appellant affecting the trial itself, all the attorneys for.the appellant withdrew from his case, and the court, without objection on the part of the appellant, dismissed the suit at his costs. No motion to vacate the order of dismissal or to reinstate the action was made. The judgment was in these words: “It is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. DotyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mott v. State ex rel. KlitzkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Wilson v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Garn v. WorkingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brock v. RudigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API