Legal Opinion
Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. Premo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 1, 1966PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
No. 347 of the 1963 Public Acts, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the Act, amended §§ 38-116, 38-187 and 38-189 (e) of the General Statutes, which regulate the making of rates by insurance companies. This action was brought by the named plaintiff and nine other nonstock insurance companies. It originally sought, in the first count, a declaratory judgment determining that the sections as amended by the Act were unconstitutional, and, in the second count, that two so-called “directives”, referred to as exhibits A and B, promulgated by the insurance commissioner in supervising rating plans…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- State v. SulSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Order of Railway Conductors of America v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- St. John's Roman Catholic Church Corp. v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Gentile v. AltermattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.