Legal Opinion

Styles v. Village of Decatur

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1902No. Docket No. 20PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Van Burén; Carr, J. Case by Adelpbia A. Styles against the village of Decatur for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff, a married woman, recovered a verdict and judgment of $750 against the defendant village by way of recompense for an injury suffered through a fall occasioned by a loose board in a sidewalk. The defendant has appealed. The accident is said to have happened in the evening after dark. She was walking with two of her children, when she was tripped by the board, which flew up in front of her as one of the children stepped upon its end, outside of the stringer. There was evidence tending to show that the walk was old, and that the boards had been loose for a long time. The plaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dundas v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Graves v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Lowell v. Township of WatertownMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Germaine v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Fuller v. Mayor of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Chicago, D. & G. B. Transit Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Scurlock v. City of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Carter v. C. F. Smith Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Dehaan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API