Legal Opinion
State v. Lee, 06ap-226 (4-3-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 3, 2007No. 06AP-226PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
{¶ 1} On January 23, 2007, defendant-appellant, Reginald Lee, filed a pro se application to reopen his appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(B). He is attempting to reopen the appellate judgment issued by this court inState v. Lee, Franklin App. No. 06AP-226, 2006-Ohio-5951. In that appeal, defendant, through counsel, argued that his convictions for aggravated robbery and a firearm specification were not supported by sufficient evidence and were against the manifest weight of the evidence. This court disagreed and affirmed defendant's convictions. The State of Ohio filed a memorandum in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. CurryOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GuysingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BagleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. Conkright, Unpublished Decision (9-28-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. BlevinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. Sutton, 06ap-708 (7-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Nelms, 06ap-1193 (9-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.