Legal Opinion
State v. Guysinger
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 1993No. 1866PublishedCited by 449 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Judge.
Plaintiff, the state of Ohio, appeals from a decision of the Chillicothe Municipal Court granting defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant.
Appellant asserts the following assignment of error:
“The trial court erred in finding no probable cause to stop when arresting officer observed Defendant’s vehicle -with only one operative taillight or brake light, the other taillight and/or brake light being damaged and failing to comply with the standards set forth in the Ohio Administrative Code.”
Having fully considered…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by449 opinions
- State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
- State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. Wilson, Ca2006-01-007 (5-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. SearlsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.