Legal Opinion

State v. Guysinger

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1993No. 1866PublishedCited by 449 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harsha, Judge.

Plaintiff, the state of Ohio, appeals from a decision of the Chillicothe Municipal Court granting defendant-appellee’s motion to suppress evidence based on lack of reasonable suspicion to stop the defendant.

Appellant asserts the following assignment of error:

“The trial court erred in finding no probable cause to stop when arresting officer observed Defendant’s vehicle -with only one operative taillight or brake light, the other taillight and/or brake light being damaged and failing to comply with the standards set forth in the Ohio Administrative Code.”

Having fully considered…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. FanningOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. AndrewsOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by449 opinions

  1. State v. McNamaraOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. MedcalfOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. State v. Wilson, Ca2006-01-007 (5-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. LandrumOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. State v. SearlsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

444 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API