Legal Opinion

State v. Curry

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 1994No. 65382PublishedCited by 562 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Benson Curry (“appellant”) appeals the trial court’s overruling of his motion to suppress the crack cocaine seized after an investigatory stop.

Appellant raises the following assignment of error:

“The trial court erred in allowing the use of evidence which was seized as a result of an improper investigatory stop, without a warrant and without any exception to the warrant requirement, in violation of the Ohio Constitution and the United States Constitution.”

Finding the assignment of error to be without merit, we affirm.

I

At the suppression hearing, Cleveland Police Detective…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by562 opinions

  1. State v. Wilson, Ca2006-01-007 (5-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  3. State v. SearlsOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. PrimeauOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. State v. BoothOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

557 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API