Federal Cartridge Corp. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
LARSON, District Judge.
Defendant seeks an Order sustaining objections to portions of plaintiff’s “Supplementing First Set Interrogatories *532Nos. 72 and 73.” Plaintiff instituted this action seeking a declaratory judgment that defendant’s Holmes ’124 and Holmes ’125 patents are invalid. Other counts of the complaint are grounded on violations of the antitrust laws and unfair competition, but they are not immediately relevant to the challenged interrogatories. Defendant’s counterclaim alleges infringement of both the Holmes ’124 and ’125 patents, as well as of its De Caro and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Onofrio v. American Beauty Macaroni Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
- Fischer & Porter Co. v. Sheffield Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vincent & Vincent, Inc. v. SpacekCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Bvocik v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968