Legal Opinion
Meese v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided April 9, 1964No. Civ. A. No. C 63-197PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CONNELL, Chief Judge.
The plaintiffs in this action are the registered owners of Letters Patent 3,-008,206. They allege that the defendant has infringed that patent by making and selling hose clamps which supposedly embody the patented invention. The plaintiffs further allege that plaintiff Clarence Meese was induced to subscribe to a fraudulent agreement relating to any inventions by him while in the defendant’s employ, and further that the defendant allegedly breached the confidence under which plaintiff Clarence E. Meese disclosed the substance of the invention in suit.
There are presently…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Stonybrook Tenants Ass'n v. AlpertDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- United States v. Columbia Steel Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- United States v. Renault, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Heller v. City of DallasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2014
- Misty M. Whitley v. C.R. Pharmacy Service, Inc. D/B/A Fifth Avenue Pharmacy, and Fifth Avenue CompoundingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Nelco Corp. v. Slater Electric Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
- Walker v. Lakewood Condominium Owners Ass'nDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.