Onofrio v. American Beauty Macaroni Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
REEVES, Chief Judge.
Counsel for defendants in the above entitled cause have propounded interrogatories to the plaintiffs. Of a total of 16 interrogatories the plaintiffs declined to answer those numbered 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 16 and filed formal objections thereto. Counsel for 'both parties have filed well prepared briefs in support of their contention.
The first objection to Interrogatory No. 1 is that to answer would require plaintiffs to enumerate items of evidence by which plaintiffs expect to prove the ultimate fact of the existence of a conspiracy. The second objection is that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Coca Cola Co. v. Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1939
- Aktiebolaget Vargos v. ClarkDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1949
- Newell v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Cinema Amusements, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1947
- Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Boucher v. Pure Oil CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. CraigMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Lohrenz v. DonnellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Cornet Stores v. SUPERIOR CT. IN & FOR CTY. OF YAVAPAIArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- United States v. PurdomeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.