Vincent & Vincent, Inc. v. Spacek
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.
Pursuant to sec. 808.03(2), Stats., this court granted Ford Motor Company leave to appeal the trial court’s order directing Ford to answer Steve Spa-cek’s written interrogatories and imposing costs and attorney’s fees on Ford. Ford argues that the interrogatories imposed an undue burden and expense entitling Ford to a protective order under sec. 804.01(3), Stats. Ford also argues that the trial court’s imposition of costs and attorney’s fees under sec. 804.12, Stats., was error. Because we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding costs and fees against Ford, we…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- John David v. The Hooker, Ltd Hooker Music, Ltd., Ronald Haffkine, Non-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Cogswell v. Robertshaw Controls Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Conrad v. ConradWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Franzen v. Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Van Straten v. Milwaukee Journal Newspaper-PublisherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1989
- Earl v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Borgwardt v. RedlinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Frankard v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.