Legal Opinion
Bvocik v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 9, 1968No. Nos. 63-C-85, 66-C-87, 63-C-86 and 66-C-88PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
The defendant, Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, has moved that the court compel the plaintiffs to answer defendant’s interrogatories of September 8, 1967. The plaintiffs have objected on the grounds that the information sought is irrelevant, not readily available, would be difficult, oppressive and burdensome to produce, and would not lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
The interrogatories seek the following information: identification of any manufacturer or distributor who has disseminated any of the information described in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Trabon Engineering Co. v. Eaton Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- Enger-Kress Co. v. Amity Leather Products Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1955
- Federal Cartridge Corp. v. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Leumi Financial Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969