Legal Opinion
Homestake Lead Co. of Missouri v. Doe Run Resources Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 15, 2003No. C 03-0326 MHPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY PROCEEDINGS
PATEL, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Homestake Lead Company (“Homestake”) brings this action against defendant Doe Run Resources Corporation (“Resources”) seeking declaratory relief with respect to Resources’ duty to defend and indemnify Homestake in a series of tort cases. Homestake alleges an obligation on the part of Resources to reimburse outstanding legal expenses and costs, to defend Homestake in ongoing cases, to indemnify Homestake against judgments, settlements, and other adverse payments that may occur in such cases,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Meadows v. Dickey's Barbecue Restaurants Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Legacy Wireless Services, Inc. v. Human Capital, L.L.C.District Court, D. Oregon · 2004
- Lexington Insurance v. Centex HomesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- PACIFICARE OF NEVADA, INC. v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- Bencharsky v. Cottman Transmission Systems, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.