Lexington Insurance v. Centex Homes
District Court, D. Hawaii
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER TRANSFERRING VENUE
SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this insurance dispute, Defendant Centex Homes (“Centex”) asks the court to enforce an indisputably valid arbitration provision in its insurance policy that requires arbitration of “disagreement^] as to the interpretation of this policy.” Centex asks the court to order the parties to arbitrate in Dallas, Texas, pursuant to the terms of their policy. Because the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA” or the “Act”) does not permit a district court to compel arbitration outside its judicial district, the only ruling this court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- (PS) Wescott v. YeeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- (PS) Wescott v. YeeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Hermanio Llevat v. True North Brands, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
- Krause v. Expedia Group IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Llevat v. True North Brands, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.