Legal Opinion

Emtel, Inc. v. Lipidlabs, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided September 30, 2008No. Civil Action H-07-1798PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

This infringement suit involves a patent for a method to provide “telemedicine” using videoconferencing to allow a physician to communicate with a medical caregiver and patient in a remote healthcare facility. The patent holder, Emtel, Inc., alleges that Lipidlabs, Inc., Specialists On Call, Inc., Tele-Med Dox, LLC, and Doctors Telehealth Network, Inc., infringed United States Patent No. 7,129,970, which describes an “Emergency Facility VideoConferencing System.” (Docket Entry No. 1). Specialists On Call, Tele-Med Dox, and Doctors…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Investment Technology Group, Inc. v. Liquidnet Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  2. Cardinal Health Solutions, Inc. v. Valley Baptist Medical CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  3. Lamson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  4. Zamora Radio, LLC v. LAST. FM, LTD.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  5. United States v. ReeceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API