Legal Opinion
Account Mgt. Associates v. Sanglimsuwan
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 2001No. B143601Published
1Opinion of the Court
110 Cal.Rptr.2d 780 (2001)
91 Cal.App.4th 773
ACCOUNT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
Sukanit SANGLIMSUWAN, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B143601.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division One.
August 15, 2001.
Ordered Not Officially Published December 12, 2001.[*]
Law Offices of Claudia C. Bohorquez and Claudia C. Bohorquez, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.
Law Offices of Steven P. Byrne and Steven P. Byrne, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
MALLANO, J.
In prior litigation, plaintiff and defendant settled by way of a "stipulation for judgment," which obligated defendant to make…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Murphy v. PadillaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Corkland v. BoscoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Harris v. Rudin, Richman & AppelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Nicholson v. BarabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.