Murphy v. Padilla
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
Appellant Patricia Padilla challenges an order of the trial court enforcing an alleged oral settlement agreement pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6. The trial court’s judgment enforcing the alleged settlement disposes of all issues in the underlying suit brought by respondents, David and Maryanne Murphy, over a disputed easement held by appellant.
Appellant raises the following questions: 1) whether an oral stipulation made during mediation referenced pursuant to section 638 is “before the court” within the meaning of section 664.6; 2) whether an alleged…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Marriage of AssemiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Dean W. Knight & Sons, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Casa De Valley View Owner's Assn. v. StevensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Delfino v. Agilent Technologies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Newton v. ClemonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Petropoulos v. PetropoulosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Jovine v. FHP, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.