Legal Opinion
Harris v. Rudin, Richman & Appel
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 18, 1999No. B125227PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
Plaintiff and appellant Dennis A. Harris (Harris) appeals from the judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, defendants’ demurrer to Harris’s complaint for breach of written contract and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Harris’s appeal challenges both the trial court’s denial of his motion to enforce a settlement agreement under Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6, and the order sustaining the demurrer without leave to amend. We affirm the court’s denial of Harris’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement pursuant to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Banner Entertainment, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Beck v. American Health Group International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Liza Brown v. Susan E. PooleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Sully-Miller Contracting Co. v. Gledson/Cashman Construction, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Toledano Ex Rel. Estate of deToledano v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Critzer v. EnosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.