Nicholson v. Barab
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRIGNON, J.
Defendants and appellants Saul and Marian Barab, individually and as trustees of the Barab Family Trust, appeal from a judgment entered after a court trial in favor of plaintiff and respondent Loretta Nicholson for damages and specific performance of an agreement to purchase residential real property from defendants. Defendants contend that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment on the issues of the existence of an agreement, the adequacy of the consideration, the performance of conditions precedent and breach of the agreement; (2) the trial court’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Valente-Kritzer Video v. Callan Pinckney Callan Productions CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gorman v. HolteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Kreling v. WalshCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Levy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.