Legal Opinion
Bragdon v. Twenty-five Twelve Associates Ltd. Partnership
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 2, 2004No. 03-CV-230PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Associate Judge, Retired:
This appeal arises from a jury verdict awarding the plaintiff/appellant the principal sum of $72,038 for overcharges in the daily rental rate at the defendant/appel-lee’s community residence facility. The principal issue on appeal is whether prejudgment interest on the overcharges should have been awarded and, if so, in what amount. We hold that prejudgment *1168interest must be awarded at the statutory-rate, calculated with respect to the date of each individual overcharge. Also at issue is whether the trial court properly refused to allow an amendment to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- District Cablevision Limited Partnership v. BassinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Bernstein v. FernandezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- District of Columbia v. Pierce Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Peerless Insurance v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Calvetti v. AntcliffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals BoardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Aziken v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.