Legal Opinion
Aziken v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 20, 2013No. 11-CV-1088PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Associate Judge:
Appellant Smart Aziken brought suit against the District of Columbia (the “District”), seeking damages for the alleged breach of a contract under which a so-called “reimbursable detail” of Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”) officers was assigned to provide police services on Friday and Saturday nights in the area around 9th and U Streets, N.W., where appellant’s nightclub establishment was in operation. Appellant contends that the contract was breached when the officers assigned to the detail on January 20, 2007, went to the police station to process an arrest,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Dunmar Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Howard University v. BestDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Federal Insurance v. American Home Assurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- INDIRA POOLA v. HOWARD UNIVERSITYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- CARLYLE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Xenophon Strategies, Inc. v. Jernigan Copeland & Anderson, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Nayereh Sahrapour v. LesRon, LLC and Shaw Centre, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Tower Insurance Company of New York v. davis/gilford, a Joint VentureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.