Legal Opinion
Tillery v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 21, 2006No. 04-AA-1363PublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
The District of Columbia seeks review of a decision of the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (“the CAB”) relating to the District’s contract with intervenor Ambush Group, Inc. (“Ambush Group”), a telecommunications consulting business. The District argues that the CAB misinterpreted the contract when it found that the scope of work provision included an audit of telecommunications equipment in addition to telecommunications lines and circuits. We hold that the contract unambiguously limited Ambush Group’s scope of work to a “line and circuit” audit. Because the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Slice v. Carozza Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- 1901 Wyoming Avenue Cooperative Ass'n v. LeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Minmar Builders, Inc. v. Beltway Excavators, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1968
- Burbridge v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Sacks v. RothbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Abdelrhman v. AckermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Marilyn Keepseagle v. Sonny PerdueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Bazarian International Financial Associates, LLC v. Desarrolloa Aerohotelco, C.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Whiting v. AARP & Unitedhealthcare InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.