Legal Opinion

Hastings Realty Corp. v. Texas Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1965PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The action of the state highway commission resulted in closing off access to the service station by way of West Forest Home avenue. Admittedly, except for a temporary encroachment, the state took no part of the leased property within the curbline. It is the contention, therefore, of Hastings, the landowner, that no part of the premises were taken, since irrespective of whether the con duct of the state was an eminent-domain taking, it was not a taking of the premises leased. Hastings contends that the land description set forth in the lease itself excludes the street area. The property as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Roseliep v. HerroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Royal Transit, Inc. v. Village of West MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hoffer Properties, LLC v. State of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. 118th Street Kenosha, LLC v. Wisconsin Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hasley v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. National Auto Truckstops, Inc. v. Department of TransportationWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API