Legal Opinion

Stefan Auto Body v. State Highway Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1963PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

This case presents the issue of whether an abutting property owner is entitled to compensation when direct access to the highway which becomes an access-free highway is replaced by a cul-de-sac frontage road which affords access at interchanges. The defendant argues such damage is not compensable because it results from a reasonable exercise of the police power in establishing the highway as a part of the national system of interstate highways. The plaintiff’s position on this appeal is that the cul-de-sac does not give it reasonable access to the express lanes of the highway and the loss of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Carter v. HarperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  5. Carazalla v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Brock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Howell Plaza, Inc. v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Troiano v. Colorado Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API