Roseliep v. Herro
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The facts in this controversy are not in dispute. The question for decision is whether the court erred in holding that the Finance Corporation, by taking judgment on its note, waived the right to foreclose its lien. The court held that the entry of judgment on the note by the Finance Corporation operated as a waiver of its lien as a matter of law, although there is language in the decision of the court which indicates that the court may also have thought that the Finance Corporation, having elected its remedy by bringing action on the note, could not thereafter take the inconsistent position…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cappon v. O'DayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Kirkwood v. HoxieMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Braasch v. BondeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- West v. FlemmingIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Tilt-Up Concrete, Inc. v. Star City/Federal, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Callaway v. EvansonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Hastings Realty Corp. v. Texas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- General Electric Co. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.