Legal Opinion

Sonday v. Dave Kohel Agency, Inc.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2006No. 2004AP2322PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J.

¶ 1. This case comes to us on certification from the court of appeals. Mark and Joyce Sonday appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Dave Kohel Agency, Inc., with whom the Sondays listed two parcels of commercial property. The circuit court, Honorable Michael S. Fisher, Kenosha County, granted summary judgment in favor of Kohel and dismissed the Sondays' action seeking a declaration that Kohel did not have a right to a commission under its listing contract with the Sondays because the Son-days' properties were transferred as the result of a condemnation action. On…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. St. Joe Corp. v. McIverSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Jackson v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Watts v. WattsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Alvarado v. SerschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State Ex Rel. Journal/Sentinel, Inc. v. PlevaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Janesville v. CC Midwest, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Wisconsin Mall Properties, LLC v. Younkers, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Everson v. City of MadisonDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  5. Ash Park, LLC v. Alexander & Bishop, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API