Legal Opinion

Carson v. Pape

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1961PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The trial court instructed the jury that:

“If you find that the arrest of the plaintiff by these defendants was not a false arrest, then that will end your consideration of the case and you will return a verdict of no cause of action in favor of the defendants.”

Appellant contends that this instruction was erroneous because a jury issue with respect to excessive force in making the arrest was presented by the pleadings and testimony. Thus, even though the officers were privileged to arrest appellant, if they used excessive force in effecting the arrest he would be entitled to damages.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grinley v. Town of Eau GalleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bursack v. DavisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Shields v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Thompson v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bentzler v. BraunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Peil v. KohnkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Baierl v. HinshawWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API