Legal Opinion
Norman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 18, 2005No. 2005-5039PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Don Norman, Roger Norman, and South Meadows Properties (collectively “appellants” or “the Normans”) appeal two decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The first, issued April 17, 2003, dismissed the Normans’ illegal exaction claim for lack of jurisdiction. Norman v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 255 (2003) (“Norman I”). The second, issued December 10, 2004, dismissed, after a trial on the merits, the Normans’ claim for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment. Norman v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 231 (2004) (“Norman II ”). The Court of Federal Claims…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- St. Christopher Associates, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Starr International Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.