Legal Opinion
Resource Investments, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 23, 2009No. 98-419 LPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
Before this court are cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The underlying claim is predicated on the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.1 In essence, plaintiffs are alleging a “temporary taking”2 of its solid waste disposal site due to a wrongful assertion of jurisdiction by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). Am. Compl. H 55. The issues, both factual and legal, are complex, and, as such, some initial background is in order.
At first blush, it might not seem that a…
2Cases cited119 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Lengen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Beres v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Love Terminal Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.