Legal Opinion

Maza v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 26, 1996PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

After a single justice of the Appeals Court denied her motion to permit her appeal to be docketed out of time, Mass. R.A.P. 10 (a) (3), 378 Mass. 937 (1979), the plaintiff renewed her motion in the county court. A single justice of this court treated the motion as a petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), and denied it without a hearing. The plaintiff appeals.

A request for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, is properly denied where the petitioning party has or had adequate and effective avenues other than G. L. c. 211, § 3, by which to seek and obtain the requested relief. Plymouth &…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tisei v. Building Inspector of MarlboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  2. Brossard v. West Roxbury Division of the District Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  3. Greco v. Suffolk Division of the Probate & Family Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Adams v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  5. Solimine v. DavidianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McMenimen v. PassatempoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Matthews v. D'ArcyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. LucasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  4. Hicks v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Kordis v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API