Legal Opinion

Pentlarge v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 5, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joel Pentlarge appeals from the denial of his petition for relief under G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court. We dismiss the appeal as moot.

Pentlarge has been civilly committed as a sexually dangerous person pursuant to G. L. c. 123A. Shortly after his commitment, he filed a petition for examination and discharge under G. L. c. 123A, § 9. Despite much effort, however, he was unable to secure a trial date that was, in his view, consistent with his right to a “speedy hearing.” G. L. c. 123A, § 9, first par. He requested that the single justice order the Chief Justice for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. First National Bank v. HauflerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Harvey v. HarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
  2. Healey v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. King v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API