Legal Opinion

Kartell v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 16, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James P. Kartell appeals from the denial of his petition pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, by a single justice of this court.

Kartell filed his petition seeking to expedite the preparation of the transcript of his criminal trial, which he claimed had been inordinately delayed.2 Kartell’s trial had lasted three weeks and eventually resulted in a transcript consisting of approximately thirty volumes and thousands of pages. When Kartell filed his petition, some fifteen months after the jury verdict, the court reporter had not submitted a complete transcript to the Superior Court clerk’s office.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rasten v. Northeastern UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  2. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Campiti v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Campiti v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  5. Harvey v. HarveyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carvalho v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Rendek v. Sheriff of Bristol CountyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Gaumond v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API