Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. Arkansas Highway & Transportation Department
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Olly Neal, Judge.
Lamar Outdoor Advertising appeals from the State Highway Commission’s denial of its application to erect a billboard along Highway 67/167 near Jacksonville.1 Lamar argues that the Commission erred in denying the application and that, when the Commission’s decision was appealed to Pulaski County Circuit Court, the court erred in failing to conduct a de novo hearing. We affirm in all respects.
The statutes and regulations pertinent to this case were promulgated pursuant to the federal and state Highway Beautification Acts. Congress passed the federal Highway Beautification Act…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- ACW, INC. v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Wright v. Arkansas State Plant BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Arkansas Health Services Agency v. Desiderata, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Williams v. Arkansas State Board of Physical TherapySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Yarbrough v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Nucor Steel-Arkansas v. Arkansas Pollution Control & Ecology CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Lamar Outdoor Advertising v. Arkansas Highway & Transportation DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
- Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation DepartmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009