Legal Opinion
Seiz Co. v. Arkansas State Highway & Transportation Department
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 18, 2009No. 09-46Published
1Opinion of the Court
324 S.W.3d 336 (2009)
2009 Ark. 361
SEIZ COMPANY, d/b/a Seiz Sign Company, Appellant,
v.
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT, Appellee.
No. 09-46.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
June 18, 2009.
Quattlebaum, Grooms, Tull & Burrow, PLLC, by: John E. Tull III, Little Rock, and Brandon B. Cate, Springdale, for appellant.
Robert L. Wilson, Chief Counsel, and Michelle L. Davenport, Staff Attorney, Arkansas Highway & Transp. Dep't, Little Rock, for appellee.
JIM GUNTER, Justice.
Appellant, Seiz Sign Company, appeals the decision of the circuit court affirming the Arkansas Highway and Transportation…
Also in this document: Dissent · Hannah; Dissent · Hannah.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Tom Vig, United States of America v. Donovan VigCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Grafton Partners L.P. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Cave City Nursing Home, Inc. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.